(Un)Known Memories: Enugu Coal, Landscape, and the Afterlife of Extraction
This exhibit moves between what is publicly commemorated and what is submerged in the ground,
the archives, and community silences.
Curated by Uzoamaka Nwachukwu
Enugu / Bloomington
Media Mining Memory Project
Collective Memory
Mining Landscapes
Hydrology
Iva Valley
(Un)Known Memories asks how a mining town can be saturated with coal,
monuments, and archival traces yet still live with a profound sense of forgetting.
The exhibit moves from well-known names such as Enugu, Iva, Udi, into the unnamed hydrological
and ecological systems that structured underground life and above-ground community
histories, and finally to contemporary struggles over statues, massacres, and silence.
Enugu’s identity as “coal city” emerges from this concentration of mines, yet in many national narratives
the specific geographies of these sites blur into a single symbol. (Un)Known Memories pulls the focus back
to individual mines, streams, and neighbourhoods.
Exhibit I
Known Facts: Named Mines, Plaques, and Newspapers
The first exhibit gathers materials that make Enugu’s coal history appear stable and well known:
named collieries, commemorative plaques, and newspaper coverage of accidents and union demands.
Iva Valley Mine at 46.
A Coal Miner quarterly feature (June 1963) frames the mine
as a proud, long-lived enterprise, emphasising years of service and round-the-clock shifts.
“Seven Die in Iva Mine Mishap.”
West African Pilot, 20 April 1956. A brief column
narrates the collapse of a wall during a storm, listing the dead and injured in a few lines.
“Miners Want Nov. 18 Observed As Holiday.”
West African Pilot, 23 May 1960.
The union asks that the date of the 1949 shootings at Iva Valley be recognised as a public holiday.
Together, these materials give us a seemingly coherent story: named mines (Iva, Udi), measurable output,
identifiable dates of disaster and protest. Yet a key question for this exhibit is:
Why was the mine named “Iva,” and how does that name sit uneasily with community memory?
What kinds of histories become “official memory and why (memory selection)”:
What stories and everyday lives get left out when we only rely on named mines, plaques, and press coverage?
In official records, “Iva Valley” appears as a unit of production and a massacre site, largely detached from
older Ngwo place-names and farming paths. Many residents know the name through school lessons or union
commemorations, but not as a lived valley with specific streams, soils, and kin histories. Memory studies helps
us see this gap between the known (public, named, archived) and the un-known (local,
ecological, embodied).
Exhibit II
Unknown Facts: Hydrology and the Mining Ecology of Onyeama (Ekulu)
The second exhibit turns from names to flows. Here the focus is the map of Onyeama mine, known earlier as
Ekulu mine, this map illustrates where streams cut across and under the gridded galleries.
Plan of Onyeama mine.
A hand-traced underground plan, kept in a former miner’s personal
records, shows galleries intersected by streams sketched in blue and green.
What does it mean to follow the mine not as a name on a map, but as water flows, shafts, and underground ecological memory shaped by mining?
Why are these hydrological and ecological memories rarely part of official archives or public commemoration? What does their absence tell us about what kinds of memory get preserved and whose experience gets acknowledged?
The map reveals a dense lattice of numbered galleries, ventilation roads, and coal faces. Cutting through this
grid are hand-drawn streams. They remind us that mining did not simply occupy empty space; it re-routed water,
created new seepage points, and altered drainage patterns that continue to shape life in the surrounding
communities.
Unlike the celebrated names of Iva or Udi, the specific hydrological systems under Onyeama/Ekulu rarely appear in
official documents. Yet for ex-miners and residents, these streams are part of an everyday mental map: places to
avoid during the rains, sources of polluted water, markers of where the ground has been hollowed underneath.
Exhibit III
Erased Coal Memory: Massacre, Statue, and Afterlives
The final exhibit moves to the present, focusing on how the state commemorates Iva Valley today and what remains
unsaid about coal’s afterlives in Enugu.
AFIA NEWS Documentary
This short film by AFIA NEWS documents the Enugu State Government’s
2023 reinstallation of the coal miners’ statue in memory of the
75th anniversary of the Iva Valley massacre.
The ceremony folds together grief, pride, and political messaging, revealing both what is remembered and what
remains unspoken in Enugu’s mining afterlives.
How does public commemoration through statues, plaques, anniversaries, and media — for example after the Iva Valley Massacre — shape what coal mining history is remembered? What is included, and what remains unspoken?
What does it mean- in memory-studies terms- when commemoration focuses on discrete events (massacre, labour, heroism) but neglects long-term environmental, social, and bodily consequences?
The film captures speeches, prayers, and wreath-laying at the statue site. It presents Iva Valley as a moment of
collective sacrifice that can be healed through renewed recognition. Yet the hydrological and ecological legacies
of mining reflected in cracked houses, unstable slopes, and polluted streams, remain largely absent from the official
script.
Memory studies prompts us to read this absence not as a simple oversight but as part of what Michel-Rolph
Trouillot calls abortive rituals: public ceremonies that acknowledge certain histories while leaving other,
equally consequential experiences unnamed. The massacre is recalled through statues and anniversaries; coal’s
longer environmental and bodily afterlives continue to live mostly in private stories and unmarked landscapes.
Memory Frameworks Connecting the Exhibit
This exhibit is in active conversation with key thinkers from the memory studies syllabus:
-
(Halbwachs; Jan and Aleida Assmann) –
The contrast between named mines and unnamed hydrologies illustrates the difference between institutionalised
collective memory and more fragile cultural memory carried in families and neighbourhoods.
-
(LaCapra; Hirsch) –
The Iva Valley massacre, mine “mishaps,” and union appeals point to layered traumas, transmitted as
postmemory to younger generations who inherit stories rather than direct experience.
-
(Agamben; Taylor) –
Ex-miners’ testimonies, hand-drawn plans, and embodied teaching become forms of witnessing and
acts of transfer, where bodies and performances store what official archives neglect.
-
(Nora) –
Statues, plaques, and massacre anniversaries operate as lieux de mémoire, competing with everyday
urban palimpsests in Enugu where traces of coal are visible but rarely signposted.
-
(Rothberg) –
Enugu’s coal story enters the field of multidirectional memory, intersecting with global histories of
slavery, colonialism, and anti-Blackness, and raising questions about who is an implicated subject in
ongoing extractive regimes.
-
(Trouillot) –
The partial recognition of Iva Valley, through selective commemorations and media silence on ecological
afterlives, echoes abortive rituals, where some histories are officially acknowledged while others
remain structurally unspeakable.
(Un)Known Memories thus works as both exhibit and syllabus: a coal-field where theories of memory,
trauma, and justice are tested against Enugu’s material and hydrological archive.
As you move through this exhibit, consider which memories are stabilised and which remain unstable: Which parts of
Enugu’s coal past are easy to narrate, and which resist language? Where does the land remember that words cannot quite
hold?